Realtime Interactive Mapping at 1000 Events / Second

By David Poncelow – Sr. Software Engineer – ADP Cobalt Business Intelligence Platform


At Cobalt, we handle a lot of traffic. We host the websites of many auto dealers, and we do a great deal of advertising on their behalf. It’s enough traffic that it’s a challenge to really understand the scope of all that we do. We recently prototyped an attempt to show a good portion of our data on a map. Conceptually it was very simple- just draw a circle on the map for every page viewed, every ad served, and every ad that was clicked on. The challenge came in the rate of these events- at peak times we see more than 1200 events/second. Displaying that many events on an interactive web page proved to be a very interesting technical challenge.

A Background in Geographic Projections

Most of us start out thinking of maps as being a special case of the Cartesian plane we learned about in our first Geometry classes. Somebody decided to call the y axis ‘latitude’, the x axis ‘longitude’, and the units ‘degrees’, but other than those strange differences, they seem the same. Sure we know that a map is flat and the world is not, but it’s easy to ignore that and presume it’s not that big of a difference.

Latitude and Longitude

So if latitude isn’t y and longitude isn’t x, what are they? Imagine a transparent sphere – put a laser pointer in the center, pointing outwards. Orient the laser pointer so that it’s perpendicular to the line between the poles of the sphere. Spin the laser pointer on that perpendicular plane – that’s the equator. Rotate it to be 10ºabove perpendicular. Now spin it horizontally – the line it makes is ten degrees latitude. Keep moving it up – when it’s parallel with the sphere’s axis, it’s at 90º. Now start at a pole and swing it along the axis to the other pole and back- a full circle of 360º. There’s longitude, though we give it a range of –180º to 180º. The axis between the poles gave us a natural reference for 0º latitude, but where is 0º longitude? At the Greenwich Naval Observatory, where all the old men who came up with this scheme worked.

Mercator and How He Messed You Up

Our expectations for maps are set mostly by the most common map ‘projection’, called the ‘Mercator Projection’. In the Mercator projection, North is always towards the top, South is always down, West is to the left and East is to the right; a projection that matches our perceptions of a flat world and what we see when we look at a compass. But again the world is not actually flat and those expectations can come back to bite us. It’s the most common of a type of projection called ‘cylindrical projections’.

Imagine taking a light and placing it in the center of a translucent globe. Then take a piece of paper and wrap it around the globe so that the edges meet along the International Date Line through the Pacific. Now trace the contours that are projected from the globe onto the paper- that’s a cylindrical projection.

Alternately, take a globe made of rubber, slice out a patch around the poles (cylindrical projections aren’t defined at the poles), cut down the date line, and then stretch it out until it’s rectangular. You can imagine that there won’t be any stretching at all in the middle (the equator), but the edges at the top and bottom will have to stretch a lot in order to reach the edges.

With Mercator, we get something that looks Cartesian, but it’s giving us a lot of distortion up towards the poles. How much distortion? Well here’s Greenland plotted twice at the same scale. The one on the left is a Mercator projection. The one on the right is a transverse Mercator projection- wrapping the paper with the seam along the equator rather than along the date line so that the distortion is around the equator instead of the poles.


Mercator vs Transverse Mercator

At a global scale, Mercator is a horrible projection- we can’t correctly compare the sizes of countries (Greenland is actually the size of Algeria) and we never navigate at that scale[1]. But there are many projections- conical, cylindrical, gnomonic, isometric. In the end, a projection is just a mathematical function that takes an input of geographic coordinates and returns a set of cartesian coordinates suitable for a two-dimensional representation.

But Why is Mercator Everywhere?

Because there is no perfect mapping from a 3-dimensional sphere to a flat screen or paper. A Mercator projection works the way that we think, though. North is always up. East is always to the right. If you draw a line between one point on the map and another and then measure the angle between, that’s the measurement that you need to hold on your compass to walk right there. In short, for navigation between places that aren’t too far apart and aren’t too close to the poles, it works exactly as you would expect. It’s the most intuitive, and as it turns out, there aren’t many people living near the poles to complain.

The Mercator projection also divides the world nicely into a grid. It’s become the de facto map projection over the last few years largely because Mapquest used this to their advantage. Take the world’s geographic data at the finest grain you have available, project it, and evenly divide it into 256px by 256px tiles. That’s your closest zoom level. For the next zoom level, take 2 tiles by 2 tiles and make that one 256px by 256px tile. Keep building a zoom level ‘pyramid’ like that until you can see the whole planet on a page.

In doing this, we can easily find the right tile for any desired point at any desired level of detail, and for any given tile we can easily determine the points within. Mercator enables the ‘Slippy Map’.

Slippy Maps

These days when we think about maps on the Internet we think about Google Maps. Before Google Maps came Mapquest. Now we have a huge variety of online maps (Bing, OpenStreetMap, Apple Maps), libraries to work with them (OpenLayers, Modest Maps, Google Maps API, Leaflet.js), and cloud mapping infrastructure (CloudMade, OpenStreetMaps, Google Maps). But all the big players share a few things in common- they are all based on the Spherical Mercator[2] projection and they are all based on a uniform grid overlaid upon that projection. In other words, (absent licensing restrictions), you can use ModestMaps with Google Maps tiles. Or Leaflet with OpenStreetMaps. The URLs (and the URL patterns) are similar; there is a difference between OpenStreetMaps and Google Maps in that the y-axis[3] is counts up from the bottom in one and from the top in the other, but generally they are all built on the same model.


For this project we chose Leaflet.js as our mapping library. It works well with a number of different tile sources, it’s pretty lightweight, mobile-friendly, and very extensible. Other alternatives were Modest MapsOpenLayers, and PolyMaps. OpenLayers is large and complex, doing a lot that we don’t need. Development on Modest Maps and PolyMaps seems to be slow or stalled, but Leaflet.js seems to have a pretty vibrant ecosystem and good documentation.

Integration with Leaflet takes the form of a couple Leaflet modules that can be added to a Leaflet map as a layer. One adds a 2D Canvas overlay, the other adds a WebGL overlay. These modules are simple- they simply work with the containing map to ensure correct alignment as Leaflet moves the underlying DOM elements on pan actions. It also exposes information about the current visible bounds of the map, the zoom level, and a function to project latitude and longitude to screen coordinates.

We coordinate with the map by way of event callbacks on the Layer object.

L.webglLayer({animationLoop: true})
    .on('initialize', function(e) {
        for (var mgr in drawing_managers) {
    .on('draw', function(e) {
        for (var mgr in drawing_managers) {

The initialize event gives an opportunity to set up resources before entering the draw loop. The draw event will be called any time the map is panned or zoomed. If the attribute animationLoop on the constructor argument is truthy, a requestAnimationFrame loop will be set up and the draw callback will be called on every tick.

Both the initialize and draw callbacks will be called with a single object with the following attributes:

Attribute Value Description
canvas The canvas DOM element
ctx The canvas drawing context (as returned by getContext(‘2d’) or getContext(‘webgl’, args)
latlon2xy Function that takes a latitude and a longitude and returns an array of [x, y] in screen coordinates.
xy2latlon Function that takes an x and a y in screen coordinates and reverse-projects them to [lat, lon]
zoom Function that returns the current zoom level of the map.

Drawing a Map With TileMill

Now we have the ability to render a map using tiles hosted somewhere else, but the real gravy is to be able to build our own maps, with our own colors and with the data that we select. To do that, the easiest tool we can use is TileMill. TileMill Allows us to pull in geographic information, style it in a syntax very similar to CSS (CartoCSS) and export the resulting map in a number of formats.

One of the most difficult parts of building a map is finding the right data. The best easy source of data is the Natural Earth project- a compiled list of both physical and cultural features that are available under a public domain license. The data is available as a mix of shapefiles and GeoTIFFs. A shapefile is a form of spatial database for vector data. This is the format in which you will find country borders, city centers, and coastlines. A GeoTIFF is a TIFF file with embedded projection, datum information[4], and extents that allow it’s pixels to be spatially positioned. This is the format in which you will find heightmaps for topography and bathymetry, ground coloring, or continuously varying data (a heatmap or vegetation coverage map would likely be available as a GeoTIFF).

Using Our Tile Set

After pulling data into TileMill and styling it as we want it, we need to deploy it so that we can use it from Leaflet. Leaflet manages figuring out which tiles to request from the server, but how do we get the tiles onto the server? In theory we could just generate all the tile images we need and copy them over into an image directory, but the sheer number of tiles we need to generate becomes a performance issue- 21,824 tiles are in our initial tile set that covering only zoom ranges 3 through 7.

A better solution would be to deploy a dedicated tile server such as TileStache which renders tiles on the fly and then caches them. That’s more infrastructure though, and we want to keep this simple.

We find an answer in one of TileMill’s export formats- mbtiles. It’s a simple format that takes each of the tile images and inserts it into a blob column in a sqlite database. The tile will be requested by a URL of the format {x}/{y}/{z}.{image format}, where {x} is the x coordinate of the tile, {y} is the y coordinate, and {z} is the zoom level. With mbtiles, x, y, and z are columns- the request then maps to the sql:

select tile_data from tiles where tile_row = ? and tile_column = ? and zoom_level = ?

We can add a simple controller to our Spring web application to take a request for tile coordinates and find it in the sqlite database. Since sqlite databases are just regular files, we created a directory to hold different styles and maps- drop a mbtiles file into that directory and you have a new map style available in Leaflet.

Here’s our map, being served up with TileMill and our controller:


Basic Basemap

Drawing Dots

Now we have a custom map and a canvas to draw on. It’s time to draw some dots. First, a diversion- why not use SVG?

The answer lies in two rendering methodologies – retained mode rendering and immediate mode. When you use retained mode, you build a model or tree of models that represent the structure of your drawing. You then iterate over that tree of models and convert it to a visual representation. As programmers we describe the model and let it draw itself.

This is very powerful and very flexible- we can work at a higher level of abstraction and build static representations that take care of themselves. Instead of calling ‘fill a circle with #0000ff at (300, 200) with a radius of 50’ on each draw call, we can specify ‘there is a circle. It’s center is at (300, 200). It has a radius of 50. Everything else is a default’, and every time the page is drawn, that circle will be there until we remove it.

The cost that we pay for that power is overhead- we have to maintain the model and keep it in sync. In the case of SVG, it’s also a relatively heavy-weight model as each graphical element is a node in the DOM, and the DOM is integrated with the DOM of the page that contains it. As a result, every time we add or remove an element it takes the computer time and effort, and it causes us to have to redraw other elements that may have been affected by our change.

Contrast this with the ‘immediate mode’ of rendering- the ‘fill a circle with blue’ above. In this case the drawing is essentially a bitmap- when the blue circle is drawn, the pixels contained within the circle are changed to blue and all state is discarded. It takes more management, but updates have a lower overhead.

For this visualization, we are trying to visualize all of our display add impressions (currently up to 450 events/second), page views (around 250/second), and ad clicks (a few tens per second). Modifying the DOM that often is going to be impractical. We also need to leave time to parse, process, and filter all ~800 or so events every second.

We also need to watch our memory churn- Javascript is a single-threaded, garbage-collected language. When we run up against a memory threshold, everything stops until memory is reclaimed. When this happens, the user sees ‘jank’- a stuttering and unpleasant rendering where everything seems jerky.

Even just an immediate-mode canvas may not be enough. But this isn’t a problem that’s unique only to trying to put dots on graphs- visualizing lots of rapidly-changing points of data has been a large focus of software development for decades- in games and scientific visualization.

A Background in WebGL

OpenGL has been a standard technology for games and visualization for many years. Specialized hardware has been designed and built in concert with the API to accelerate processing and rendering of data. A graphics card is designed to be massively parallel- my current laptop has 40 cores, and some cards have more than 350 cores. OpenGL has been evolved to process massive amounts of data quickly and to process that data into images at lightning speed. When mobile devices such as the iPhone started getting prevalent, Khronos (the OpenGL working group) developed a stripped-down version of OpenGL for mobile devices called OpenGL ES. They then revised desktop OpenGL to better match the rendering pipeline as implemented on video cards (relying on program fragments running on the cards). After that redesign came OpenGL ES 2.0 to bring the mobile devices in line with new desktop practices. Then that got ported to the web.

What is WebGL?

WebGL is basically OpenGL ES 2.0 with a Javascript API. The advantage to us is that it allows us to offload a lot of the data visualization to the video card, allowing it to be processed in a massively parallel fashion rather than relying on the single-threaded behavior of the rest of our Javascript runtime. To do this we need to learn a new way of processing graphics.


In both of the examples above, we dealt with the circles we are drawing individually. With SVG we add a <circle> node to the DOM and style it to place it. With Canvas we fill an arc. With WebGL we put together an array of data that we want to render, ship it en masse to the video card and convert them to an image there.

First, we need to set up a rendering pipeline[5]. To do this, we have to declare a buffer to hold our data and ‘attach’ it to the current context. We then need to supply data to that buffer. We need to compile a vertex shader and a fragment shader, we need to bind both together into a program that will actually run on the video card’s render cores, and then we need to attach it to the current context. We then need to set the context for the next run of the program using uniform variables. We specify how to map attribute variables to vertexes, and finally with the state prepared we can call gl.drawArrays() and the whole pipeline is distributed and set in motion.

Vertex Shaders and Fragment Shaders

The program running on the video card is made up of two components- a vertex shader and a fragment shader. What we are doing in the shaders is very analogous to the geographic projections we discussed earlier. We take coordinates in our program’s coordinate system and we translate and project them into the OpenGL coordinate system. We do this in two steps. First, we use a vertex shader to take a point in the user coordinate system and we return a location in the OpenGL coordinate system. Second, the system correlates the vertex with the other vertexes in the primitive it belongs to (the other two vertexes for a triangle, the other one for a line, or none for a point), figures out what pixels in the image may[6] change based on the primitive. It then calls the fragment shader for each pixel which assigns the color or discards it.

Uniforms, Varyings, and Attributes

We coordinate with and between these shaders using three types of variables- uniforms, varyings, and attributes.

A uniform is a value that is the same for every vertex and every fragment- it is essentially a global variable for the shader program. We use these to coordinate between the hosting program and the shader program.

A varying is used for coordinating between a vertex shader and a fragment shader. For primitives with several vertexes the value read by the fragment shader will be interpolated between it’s associated vertices. For example if a fragment is at the midpoint of a line one vertex of which sets a varying named vColor to vec3(1.0, 0.0, 0.0)  [7] and the other vertex sets vColor to vec3(0.0, 1.0, 0.0), the fragment will read vColor as vec3(0.5, 0.5, 0.0).

The final type of variable is an attribute- attributes are per-vertex values that are supplied as the input to the OpenGL pipeline.

Plotting Points on a Map

OK, now that we have some background on maps and some background on WebGL, let’s put it all together and put some markers on a map.

Requirements (differing colors, size, shrink, opacity, fade)

The starting point of this map was a prior POC. That iteration used a technique called ‘ping-ponging’. It used two off-screen buffers and a two-dimensional canvas. As events came in, they would be rendered immediately to the 2d canvas. On each animation frame, the previous frame (stored in a framebuffer) was copied to a second framebuffer with a GLSL program that blurred it. The contents of the 2D canvas would then be written on top of the blurred frame. The frame was then copied to the screen. The 2D canvas and the first framebuffer were then cleared, and the second framebuffer became the source for the next iteration.

That approach had some fatal limitations. First, that the map didn’t zoom. It was set to a view of the United States using an Albers Equal Area projection that preserved the relative sizes and proportions of regions, but it didn’t allow for focusing on a region. Second, there wasn’t any ability to vary the representations of different plotted traffic. Since all of the markers were ‘degraded’ together as an image, it wasn’t possible to make more important events like ad clicks more prominent than less important events like ad impressions so they were swallowed up in the noise. Additionally, treating the marker overlay as an image didn’t work well if we added interaction- if the map were panned, blank areas would be moved onto the screen. If it were zoomed the markers would no longer match up with their geographic locations.

The solution was to move away from the hybrid 2D Canvas/WebGL image processing model and move to OpenGL vertex arrays. Each marker type is given it’s own buffer of locations and the shader program takes arguments through uniform variables to vary the color, size, whether it shrinks over time, it’s inital opacity, and whether it fades to transparent.

Projecting Events

We have spent an awful lot of time working up to this, but here’s where we tie it all together. We know that we can’t treat each event as a momentary instance and forget about it- since the marker may move around the screen, may change in size based on the map zoom, and may fade, we need to keep some information about the event for as long as it’s on the screen. We want to keep the barest minimum of data we can, though! We can distill the required data down to three pieces- the location of the event, the time of the event, and the type of event. We can define all of the other properties as functions of those three attributes. How that plays out is a little subtle, however.

The screen location of a marker may change at any time- any time a user touches the screen the map we are overlaying changes it’s bounds, which changes the portion of the earth that we are displaying. It doesn’t make any sense to loop through in the slow single-threaded Javascript context and blocking the UI thread to project them from their geographic coordinates to screen coordinates. This is particularly true since many of the points may not even actually be plotted- if the map is zoomed to view Denver, the user will never see events in Wichita.

The solution to this lies in what a geographic projection is and why we spent so long in going over it earlier; it’s just a function that takes geographic coordinates and maps them to a cartesian plane. A vertex shader similarly takes coordinates in a programmer-defined space and projects them into a screen space- defined in OpenGL as a range between –1.0 and 1.0 along each axis. Anything that falls outside of that range is quickly and efficiently discarded. So we can simply define our programmer-defined space to be a geographic space of spherical coordinates, and our projection function to be the Spherical Mercator projection interpolated within map bounds at the time of render.

Here is the Spherical Mercator projection, with scaling for zoom levels, as implemented in the vertex shader:

float scale_factor(float zoom) {
    float result = 256.0 * pow(2.0, zoom);
    return result;

vec2 transform(vec2 point, float zoom) {
    vec2 result = vec2((((0.5 / M_PI) * point.x) + 0.5), ((-0.5 / M_PI) * point.y + 0.5)) * scale_factor(zoom);
    return result;

vec2 project(vec2 point) {
    vec2 result = vec2(point.x * DEG_TO_RAD, log(tan((M_PI / 4.0) + (point.y * DEG_TO_RAD ) / 2.0)));
    return result;

void main() {
    vec2 transformed = transform(project(a_coords.xy), u_zoom);

With this in place, we simply specify our x-values as degrees longitude and our y-values as degrees latitude[^xy ordering].

This gets us much of the way there, but we can’t ignore z-values. Since we are drawing all of these points at once, if we don’t assign a z-value they will all be the same, which turns into a situation called ‘z-fighting’ as a marker will be drawn under another marker one frame and over it the next. This becomes a really distracting flicker when it’s animated.

We expect that the most recent markers should be on top of older markers, and that as new markers come in they cover those that were there before. In order to accomplish this we pass in our event time in the place of a normal z- value. If we pass in the current time and establish a time window, we can map event times to our z-value. In our case each marker fades out in a few seconds, so we can assert that we won’t even display an event older than a minute. We can then map the time range of ‘now – one minute’ to ‘now’ to the z-values –1.0 to 1.0. Now we have it so that the most recent events are always at the top of the stack- exactly what we expect.

Making Circles

That makes displaying markers work pretty well. But we are displaying points, and by default points in OpenGL are square. This looks horrible. We need another trick to turn them into circles.

In a fragment shader we can discard any fragments that we don’t want. We can use this to turn our squares into circles.

float distance = distance(gl_PointCoord, vec2(0.5, 0.5));
if (distance > 0.5) {

In the fragment shader, gl_PointCoord is a vec2 normalized to the range [0.0, 1.0], so the center is at [0.5, 0.5] no matter what the size of the point is in screen coordinates. We take a look at the distance from the center to the current location, and if it’s more than 0.5 (the distance from the center to an edge vertically or horizontally) we discard it.

Fuzzing Borders

That’s a lot better, but the borders on the circles are full of jaggies- by just discarding pixels we have a sharp edge. Instead of just discarding, let’s ramp the alpha to the closer you get to the edge.

// This value 'fuzzes' the edges a bit to make the circles look better
float falloff_modifier = clamp(pow(1.8 - distance * 2.0, 2.0), 0.0, 1.0); gl_FragColor = vec4(u_color.rgb, falloff_modifier);

The actual code takes into account an original alpha (u_color.a[8]) and a potential fade, but this code gives us nice, smooth circles.

The ‘Finished’ Product

Now we have a map that we can pan and zoom- in our office we have it running on a 55″ television with an infrared touch overlay. We can now style the different types of events individually, changing color, size, fading and shrinking, and we can keep up with our traffic rate- at times exceeding 1500 events per second and still maintain a 60 frame/second draw rate. We actually still have a lot of breathing room, too- according to Chrome’s development tools, rendering a frame takes consistently takes less than 2ms on my MacBook Pro. You can see the video in full motion below.

Map Demo


  1. In a previous life I was a Quartermaster in the U.S. Coast Guard. During my tenure there I got to plan several long cruises- the first was from Sitka, AK to Honolulu, HI. While we are all familiar with the adage that the ‘closest distance between two points is a straight line’, that doesn’t make much sense in navigation- with a round planet, the closest distance between two points leads through the earth. When navigating across the Earth, the closest route will be a great circle route– an arc of a circle which passes through the center of the earth. In order to determine this course, we plotted it on a small scale chart (covering a wide area) that used a Gnomonic projection. We then broke that line into segments, got the latitude and longitude of the endpoints of each segment, and then overlaid them on a Mercator projection to determine the course to steer for that segment of the voyage. Just a tangential illustration of various uses of different projections.  ↩
  2. The Earth is not, as many of us have been taught, a globe or a sphere. It’s wider at the equator than it is at the poles, making it an oblong spheroid. In fact it’s not actually even an oblong sphereoid- it’s not regular in that description either. As we describe the Earth more and more accurately, we use different datums to better describe the unique shape of the earth. The spherical in Spherical Mercator means that we simplify everything by presuming that the Earth is a sphere. My high school physics teacher would be proud.  ↩
  3. I talked a lot above about latitude not being the y axis- why am I using y axis here? It’s a subtle point that took me a while to really understand- projection is taking a location on a globe and placing it on a cartesian plane. If we are talking about a point on the globe it’s latitude. If we are talking about a spot on a map, a two-dimensional representation, it’s the y axis as we suspected all along.  ↩
  4. When making a map, this can be really big pitfall. Data can be found in all sorts of different geographic reference systems, and they aren’t directly compatible- they have to be translated back and forth. When you find a shapefile, make sure you make note of the datum- TileMill can fix it for you, but you have to tell it what to expect. Data from Natural Earth is all in WGS84 which is something of a web mapping default and it’s what TileMill expects, but it can make for a nasty surprise. For example another big source of data is census data, known as TIGER/Line. That data uses a datum called NAD83. These datum are also known by an ‘EPSG’ entry number- WGS84 is EPSG:4326 and NAD83 is EPSG:4269.  ↩
  5. This is obviously a comically simplified version of WebGL with large portions that we aren’t using for this example missing (including features that were used in the prior prototype). The WebGL Programming Guide is a good place to start, as is the OpenGL ES 2.0 Programming Guide ↩
  6. It’s called a fragment shader and not a pixel shader because the output of a fragment shader might not actually change a pixel. As a simple example, OpenGL will take a look at the z-axis value of the pixel- if it would be occluded by another fragment in the buffer the pixel will be discarded.  ↩
  7. GLSL doesn’t do conversion of types for you- and that includes the conversion of an int to a float as we have come to expect from the C family of languages. If you specify a vec3(1, 0.0, 0.0), GLSL will refuse to compile because of the mixed types. While this makes sense, it goes contrary to a behavior we may expect from other programming languages. It has been the source of an inordinate amount of cursing as I have learned to use GLSL effectively.  ↩
  8. One clever bit about the GLSL language is that you can refer to elements of a vector type by letter codes. Generally a vec4 represents either a location (xyzw) or a color (rgba). You can refer to the first element by color.r, the third element by color.b and a vec2 containing both by color.rb. You can even change order- color.argb is perfectly valid and will return a vec4 with the elements placed in that order, and color.aaaa will return a vec4 with four copies of the fourth value. You can even swap the sets (though you can’t mix them): color.x will give you the red value. But don’t do that.  ↩

About collectivegenius
Everyone has a voice and great ideas come from anyone. At Cobalt, we call it the collective genius. When technical depth and passion meets market opportunity, the collective genius is bringing it’s best to the table and our customers win.

One Response to Realtime Interactive Mapping at 1000 Events / Second

  1. C Douglas says:

    Reminds me of that West Wing episode. Organization of Cartographers for Social Equality


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: